Sebastian Carrera

Sebastian Carrera "Seb"

SIP-000001 PF #24 · Chino Hills Huskies · Class of 2029
5'-11" · 137 lbs. · 4.0 GPA

Career Stats

Official Stats (18 games — League & Playoff)
9.3PPG
3.8RPG
2.9APG
2.3SPG
0.1BPG
Overall Stats (29 games — All Games)
9.0PPG
3.9RPG
2.7APG
2.2SPG
0.2BPG

Career Assessment

Progression by Level
Freshman 21 games
9.4 PPG
3.8 RPG · 2.8 APG · 53% 2PT
JV 8 games
8.0 PPG
4.1 RPG · 2.4 APG · 70% 2PT
Section 1

Career Overview

JV 8.0 PPG 4.1 RPG 2.4 APG 70% 2PT
At the JV level, Seb is averaging 8.0 points, 4.1 rebounds, 2.4 assists, 1.9 steals, and 0.5 blocks across eight games, and the profile that emerges is one of a multi-category contributor whose value extends well beyond the scoring column.

At the JV level, Seb is averaging 8.0 points, 4.1 rebounds, 2.4 assists, 1.9 steals, and 0.5 blocks across eight games, and the profile that emerges is one of a multi-category contributor whose value extends well beyond the scoring column. The most important context for evaluating those numbers is game competitiveness: two of his eight JV outings came in blowouts, including the 99-15 tournament win over Southland where he posted 10 points, 5 assists, and 6 steals in what was essentially a non-competitive environment. Stripping those games away and anchoring the evaluation in the close and competitive matchups — against Rancho (a 3-point loss), Upland (a 1-point win), and Montclair Team A (a 3-point win) — the picture becomes more meaningful and more nuanced. In those high-leverage games, Seb has shown the ability to deliver when it matters: his 18-point, 5-rebound performance against Rancho in a 3-point tournament loss stands as his most impressive JV output to date, built on an elite 7-of-8 clip inside the arc that suggests real finishing instinct and footwork around the basket. Against Upland in a 1-point win, his scoring dipped to 2 points and he committed 3 turnovers, which remains his clearest single-game red flag at this level. The Montclair Team A win, also decided by 3, saw him score 9 points on efficient shooting with zero turnovers. The throughline in close games is that his efficiency inside the arc holds up — his JV two-point shooting sits at 71 percent — while his perimeter game remains inconsistent at 29 percent on 17 attempts. Free throw shooting is an active concern at this level: he is 0-of-3 from the line across eight JV games, a sample too small to make a firm judgment but notable enough to watch as he faces more physical competition.

His transition from the freshman level to JV is worth framing properly for context. As a freshman across 21 games, Seb averaged 9.4 points, 3.8 rebounds, 2.8 assists, and 2.3 steals, shooting 54 percent on two-point attempts and 39 percent from three. Those freshman numbers were built on a mix of blowouts and competitive games, with his best performances — a 21-point, 10-rebound effort against Centennial in an 11-point win and a 15-point, 4-steal line against a competitive Etiwanda team — demonstrating the kind of high-ceiling output that justified the JV move. At JV, his two-point efficiency has actually improved from 54 to 71 percent, which is a meaningful development signal: Seb is not just surviving the level jump, he is finishing more decisively inside than he did as a freshman. What has shifted, however, is his three-point volume and efficiency. As a freshman he was a legitimate perimeter threat at 39 percent on 56 attempts; at JV he is shooting 29 percent on 17 attempts, a sample that is too small to signal a true regression but worth monitoring over the next full season to determine whether the step up in competition has genuinely affected his perimeter game or whether it is a short-run variance issue. His defensive identity — active hands, passing lane awareness, and a genuine feel for taking the ball away — has carried cleanly from the freshman level, and his playmaking instincts remain one of the most distinctive traits in his profile for a player listed as a power forward.

Section 2

Recruiting Outlook

D3 NAIA D2
For college coaches beginning to build their 2029 boards, Seb presents as a legitimate multi-divisional tracking prospect whose current JV performance warrants early attention at the D3 and NAIA levels, with a credible path toward D2 evaluation as his body and statistical profile develop.

For college coaches beginning to build their 2029 boards, Seb presents as a legitimate multi-divisional tracking prospect whose current JV performance warrants early attention at the D3 and NAIA levels, with a credible path toward D2 evaluation as his body and statistical profile develop. The attribute that separates him from most players at his level is not any single counting stat — it is the combination of two-point finishing efficiency at 71 percent, genuine playmaking instinct from the power forward position, and consistent defensive activity across competitive game contexts. His 18-point game against Rancho in a tournament loss — built almost entirely on elite interior finishing — is the most transferable data point in his current JV file, because it came in a close game against real competition. Coaches evaluating him should weight that performance heavily and treat the blowout outings as atmosphere rather than evidence. His 4.0 GPA is not a footnote — at the D3 level in particular, that academic profile opens doors to academically selective programs that could offer meaningful scholarship and roster opportunity.

The development priorities are clear and addressable given his timeline. Three-point consistency needs to stabilize above the 35 percent range before it can function as a reliable weapon against college-level closeouts — right now at JV it is trending in the wrong direction and needs a full season of competitive data before a firm projection is possible. Free throw creation and conversion is the most urgent mechanical concern: zero makes from three attempts at JV suggests he is either avoiding contact at the rim or not yet drawing enough defensive attention to get there, and both of those things need to change as he fills out physically. Turnover discipline in close games — the 3-turnover outing against Upland being the primary example — is a situational issue that will resolve itself as his role expands and his comfort with high-leverage possessions grows. The most actionable advice for a college staff is this: get him on your radar now, evaluate him in competitive game environments rather than summer blowout settings, and revisit in a full JV or early varsity season. The playmaking, the finishing efficiency, and the defensive instincts are all real. The question is whether the perimeter shooting and physicality scale with competition, and a full year of data will answer that cleanly.

JV Stats & Highlights (8 games) 8.0 PPG · 4.1 RPG · 2.4 APG

Game PTSFGMFGAFG% 3PM3PA3P% FTMFTAFT% 2PM2PA2P% PPSeFG%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. WCWednesday, June 24th, 2026 7 3837.5% 1333.3% 00 2540.0% 0.88 43.8%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. RanchoMonday, June 22nd, 2026 18 81361.5% 1520.0% 020.0% 7887.5% 1.38 65.4%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. UplandWednesday, June 17th, 2026 2 1250.0% 010.0% 010.0% 11100.0% 1.00 50.0%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Montclair Team AMonday, June 15th, 2026 9 4850.0% 1333.3% 00 3560.0% 1.12 56.2%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Chaffey High SchoolMonday, June 8th, 2026 7 3475.0% 11100.0% 00 2366.7% 1.75 87.5%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Montclair High SchoolWednesday, June 3rd, 2026 7 3560.0% 1250.0% 00 2366.7% 1.40 70.0%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Alta Loma High SchoolMonday, June 1st, 2026 4 2366.7% 00 00 2366.7% 1.33 66.7%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Southland High SchoolWednesday, May 27th, 2026 10 5862.5% 020.0% 00 5683.3% 1.25 62.5%
Totals (8G) 64 295156.9% 51729.4% 030.0% 243470.6% 1.25 61.8%

Freshman Stats & Highlights (21 games) 9.4 PPG · 3.8 RPG · 2.8 APG

Game PTSFGMFGAFG% 3PM3PA3P% FTMFTAFT% 2PM2PA2P% PPSeFG%
vs DamienImported01/29/2026 1 010.0% 010.0% 1250.0% 00 1.00 0.0%
vs RCHSImported01/20/2026 6 2540.0% 1333.3% 1250.0% 1250.0% 1.20 50.0%
vs EtiwandaImported01/13/2026 15 61346.2% 3475.0% 00 3933.3% 1.15 57.7%
vs Los OsosImported01/08/2026 9 33100.0% 33100.0% 020.0% 00 3.00 150.0%
vs UplandImported01/06/2026 5 2633.3% 1333.3% 00 1333.3% 0.83 41.7%
vs CentennialImported12/20/2025 21 81747.1% 2633.3% 33100.0% 61154.5% 1.24 52.9%
vs RamonaImported12/19/2025 3 1520.0% 1520.0% 00 00 0.60 30.0%
vs BarstowImported12/18/2025 14 61154.5% 1333.3% 1250.0% 5862.5% 1.27 59.1%
vs AVHSImported12/16/2025 10 4850.0% 2450.0% 00 2450.0% 1.25 62.5%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Chino CowboysThursday, December 11, 2025 5 2540.0% 1333.3% 00 1250.0% 1.00 50.0%
vs ChinoImported12/11/2025 5 2633.3% 1425.0% 00 1250.0% 0.83 41.7%
vs CarterImported12/06/2025 10 3837.5% 1425.0% 3475.0% 2450.0% 1.25 43.8%
vs DRHSImported12/05/2025 4 2450.0% 010.0% 00 2366.7% 1.00 50.0%
vs Rancho VerdeImported12/02/2025 2 11100.0% 00 00 11100.0% 2.00 100.0%
vs ClaremontImported12/01/2025 15 6875.0% 11100.0% 2366.7% 5771.4% 1.88 81.2%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Corona Centennial HuskiesSaturday, November 29, 2025 15 4944.4% 010.0% 77100.0% 4850.0% 1.67 44.4%
vs CentennialImported11/29/2025 16 51241.7% 010.0% 6875.0% 51145.5% 1.33 41.7%
vs SantiagoImported11/28/2025 13 51050.0% 1333.3% 22100.0% 4757.1% 1.30 55.0%
vs ElsinoreImported11/25/2025 5 2540.0% 010.0% 1250.0% 2450.0% 1.00 40.0%
vs KingImported11/24/2025 14 5683.3% 2366.7% 22100.0% 33100.0% 2.33 100.0%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Santiago BSaturday, October 25th, 2025 9 4850.0% 1250.0% 00 3650.0% 1.12 56.2%
Totals (21G) 197 7315148.3% 225639.3% 293974.4% 519553.7% 1.30 55.6%

Academic Record (1 semester)

4.0 GPA — 1 semester tracked

Unlock Full Academic Profile — $4.99/mo