Sebastian Carrera

Sebastian Carrera

SIP-000001 PG #17 · Chino Cowboys · Class of 2029
5'-11" · 139 lbs. · 4.0 GPA

Career Stats

Official Stats (18 games — League & Playoff)
9.3PPG
3.8RPG
2.9APG
2.3SPG
0.1BPG
Overall Stats (31 games — All Games)
9.0PPG
3.8RPG
2.7APG
2.2SPG
0.2BPG

Career Assessment

Progression by Level
Freshman 21 games
9.4 PPG
3.8 RPG · 2.8 APG · 53% 2PT
JV 8 games
8.0 PPG
4.1 RPG · 2.4 APG · 70% 2PT
Varsity 2 games
8.5 PPG
2.5 RPG · 3.5 APG · 25% 2PT
Section 1

Career Overview

Varsity 8.5 PPG 2.5 RPG 3.5 APG 25% 2PT
Sebastian is now operating at the Varsity level, and through two games, the early returns are genuinely encouraging.

Sebastian is now operating at the Varsity level, and through two games, the early returns are genuinely encouraging. He is averaging 8.5 points, 2.5 rebounds, and 3.5 assists per game at Varsity, with his most striking number being his three-point shooting — he has connected on 4 of 5 attempts from deep across both outings for an 80% clip. That figure is a small sample, but it is consistent with a direction rather than a fluke. In his Varsity debut against Ontario Christian — a five-point game in a close, meaningful environment — he posted 8 points, 3 assists, and 2 steals while shooting efficiently from both two and three-point range, with his only blemish being 2 turnovers against 3 assists. The follow-up against Colony, a more comfortable 19-point win, was arguably cleaner in execution: 9 points on 3-of-3 shooting from three, 4 assists, and zero turnovers. His 2-point attempts at Varsity have been limited — just 4 total across both games, connecting on only 1 — which means his interior efficiency has not yet been tested at this level. The assist numbers are trending in the right direction for a point guard, and his turnover rate has improved from game one to game two. Two games is a thin sample, but Sebastian has shown he can compete in a Varsity setting without being overmatched.

His path to this point is worth understanding as context. Across 21 Freshman-level games, Sebastian averaged 9.4 points, 3.8 rebounds, 2.8 assists, and 2.3 steals per game, with shooting splits of 54% on two-point attempts and 39% from three. His freshman season demonstrated real scoring range, including a 21-point, 10-rebound performance against Centennial in a competitive game and a 15-point outing in a close three-point win over Centennial in a separate contest, as well as a 15-point, 4-steal line against Santiago in a blowout. However, many of his stronger statistical games at the Freshman level came against overmatched opponents in blowout conditions — the 99-15 win over Southland, the 66-4 win over DRHS, and similar matchups — which tempers some of the volume-scoring conclusions. His most reliable evaluation windows at that level were his competitive games, where he demonstrated both scoring punch and defensive awareness before being moved up. At JV across 8 games, Sebastian averaged 8.0 points, 4.1 rebounds, 2.4 assists, and 1.9 steals per game, with two-point efficiency jumping to 71% on a smaller volume of attempts. His JV sample was again mixed in terms of competition quality — tournament blowouts padded some lines — but close games against Rancho and Upland revealed his best multi-category production, particularly an 18-point, 87.5% interior shooting performance against Rancho in a three-point loss that remains the clearest look at his upside in a genuinely contested environment. His three-point shooting dipped to 29% at JV, and he went 0-for-3 from the free throw line across that stretch, two data points that warrant attention. Each level has surfaced the same core identity: Sebastian is a two-way player who defends in passing lanes, distributes without losing the ball, and can score in bunches when his shot is on — but both his interior finishing under pressure and his free throw habits need continued development.

Section 2

Recruiting Outlook

D3 NAIA D2
For college coaches beginning to build their 2029 boards, Sebastian is a point guard worth tracking through his Mount Baldy League schedule, where competition quality will offer the clearest signal about how his game translates against organized, physically developed opponents.

For college coaches beginning to build their 2029 boards, Sebastian is a point guard worth tracking through his Mount Baldy League schedule, where competition quality will offer the clearest signal about how his game translates against organized, physically developed opponents. At this stage, his Varsity sample is two games old, which is not enough to project a division with confidence, but the profile being built across 31 games at multiple levels points toward a realistic D3 and NAIA conversation with genuine D2 potential depending on how his game scales over the next two to three years. His perimeter shooting — if the 80% Varsity mark settles anywhere near his 39% Freshman average over a longer sample — would be a legitimate weapon for a point guard in any college system. His defensive instincts, particularly his steal rates across all three levels, have been among the most consistent elements of his game and translate up. The playmaking is real: his assist-to-turnover management has improved across levels, and his 4-assist, zero-turnover game against Colony is the kind of floor general performance coaches notice.

The development priorities are clear. His two-point shooting at Varsity — 1-of-4 through two games — means he has not yet demonstrated an ability to finish at the Varsity rim, and until he does, his scoring profile depends heavily on whether defenses decide to contest his perimeter attempts more aggressively. His free throw shooting carries a gap in the JV data that needs to be resolved with consistent volume at Varsity. And his overall scoring load at 8.5 points per game at Varsity is functional but modest for a point guard expected to drive an offense at the next level — he will need to show he can expand that number as the season deepens. Programs evaluating him should prioritize watching him in close, competitive Mount Baldy League games where the defensive pressure and game-management demands will test both his scoring creation and decision-making in ways that blowout and tournament environments simply cannot replicate. The combination of a 4.0 GPA, two-way awareness, and a genuine perimeter shooting threat gives Sebastian a profile worth investing attention in now.

Varsity Stats & Highlights (2 games) 8.5 PPG · 2.5 RPG · 3.5 APG

Game PTSFGMFGAFG% 3PM3PA3P% FTMFTAFT% 2PM2PA2P% PPSeFG%
Chino Cowboys vs. ColonySaturday, October 17th, 2026 9 3560.0% 33100.0% 00— 020.0% 1.80 90.0%
Chino Cowboys vs. Ontario ChristianSaturday, October 10th, 2026 8 2450.0% 1250.0% 3475.0% 1250.0% 2.00 62.5%
Totals (2G) 17 5955.6% 4580.0% 3475.0% 1425.0% 1.89 77.8%

JV Stats & Highlights (8 games) 8.0 PPG · 4.1 RPG · 2.4 APG

Game PTSFGMFGAFG% 3PM3PA3P% FTMFTAFT% 2PM2PA2P% PPSeFG%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. WCWednesday, June 24th, 2026 7 3837.5% 1333.3% 00— 2540.0% 0.88 43.8%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. RanchoMonday, June 22nd, 2026 18 81361.5% 1520.0% 020.0% 7887.5% 1.38 65.4%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. UplandWednesday, June 17th, 2026 2 1250.0% 010.0% 010.0% 11100.0% 1.00 50.0%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Montclair Team AMonday, June 15th, 2026 9 4850.0% 1333.3% 00— 3560.0% 1.12 56.2%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Chaffey High SchoolMonday, June 8th, 2026 7 3475.0% 11100.0% 00— 2366.7% 1.75 87.5%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Montclair High SchoolWednesday, June 3rd, 2026 7 3560.0% 1250.0% 00— 2366.7% 1.40 70.0%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Alta Loma High SchoolMonday, June 1st, 2026 4 2366.7% 00— 00— 2366.7% 1.33 66.7%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Southland High SchoolWednesday, May 27th, 2026 10 5862.5% 020.0% 00— 5683.3% 1.25 62.5%
Totals (8G) 64 295156.9% 51729.4% 030.0% 243470.6% 1.25 61.8%

Freshman Stats & Highlights (21 games) 9.4 PPG · 3.8 RPG · 2.8 APG

Game PTSFGMFGAFG% 3PM3PA3P% FTMFTAFT% 2PM2PA2P% PPSeFG%
vs DamienImported01/29/2026 1 010.0% 010.0% 1250.0% 00— 1.00 0.0%
vs RCHSImported01/20/2026 6 2540.0% 1333.3% 1250.0% 1250.0% 1.20 50.0%
vs EtiwandaImported01/13/2026 15 61346.2% 3475.0% 00— 3933.3% 1.15 57.7%
vs Los OsosImported01/08/2026 9 33100.0% 33100.0% 020.0% 00— 3.00 150.0%
vs UplandImported01/06/2026 5 2633.3% 1333.3% 00— 1333.3% 0.83 41.7%
vs CentennialImported12/20/2025 21 81747.1% 2633.3% 33100.0% 61154.5% 1.24 52.9%
vs RamonaImported12/19/2025 3 1520.0% 1520.0% 00— 00— 0.60 30.0%
vs BarstowImported12/18/2025 14 61154.5% 1333.3% 1250.0% 5862.5% 1.27 59.1%
vs AVHSImported12/16/2025 10 4850.0% 2450.0% 00— 2450.0% 1.25 62.5%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Chino CowboysThursday, December 11, 2025 5 2540.0% 1333.3% 00— 1250.0% 1.00 50.0%
vs ChinoImported12/11/2025 5 2633.3% 1425.0% 00— 1250.0% 0.83 41.7%
vs CarterImported12/06/2025 10 3837.5% 1425.0% 3475.0% 2450.0% 1.25 43.8%
vs DRHSImported12/05/2025 4 2450.0% 010.0% 00— 2366.7% 1.00 50.0%
vs Rancho VerdeImported12/02/2025 2 11100.0% 00— 00— 11100.0% 2.00 100.0%
vs ClaremontImported12/01/2025 15 6875.0% 11100.0% 2366.7% 5771.4% 1.88 81.2%
vs CentennialImported11/29/2025 16 51241.7% 010.0% 6875.0% 51145.5% 1.33 41.7%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Corona Centennial HuskiesSaturday, November 29, 2025 15 4944.4% 010.0% 77100.0% 4850.0% 1.67 44.4%
vs SantiagoImported11/28/2025 13 51050.0% 1333.3% 22100.0% 4757.1% 1.30 55.0%
vs ElsinoreImported11/25/2025 5 2540.0% 010.0% 1250.0% 2450.0% 1.00 40.0%
vs KingImported11/24/2025 14 5683.3% 2366.7% 22100.0% 33100.0% 2.33 100.0%
Chino Hills Huskies vs. Santiago BSaturday, October 25th, 2025 9 4850.0% 1250.0% 00— 3650.0% 1.12 56.2%
Totals (21G) 197 7315148.3% 225639.3% 293974.4% 519553.7% 1.30 55.6%

Academic Record (1 semester)

4.0 GPA — 1 semester tracked

Unlock Full Academic Profile — $4.99/mo